Shah Wali Allah’s View on Muwatta of Imam Malik

Shah Wali Allah belonged to the Hanafi school of fiqh, as did his forefathers. Shaykh Abu Tahir al-Kurdi, however, was a Shafi’i. This led Shah Wali Allah to treat the Hanafi and Shafi’i’ schools of fiqh with the same deference. Although in his home country he chose to follow the Hanafi school as far as practicable, he did not altogether dismiss the Shafi’i school. He based his study of Hanafi Fiqh on the works of al-Shaybani, and that of Shafi’i Fiqh directly on the works of al-Shafi’i. Noting that both al-Shaybani and al-Shafi’i had derived their Fiqh from Malik ibn Anas, Shah Wali Allah concluded that Malik’s Muwatta was the basis of all Fiqh, and that all the Fiqhi doctrines of the four Sunni schools had developped from the same roots. Since al-Muwatta had been compiled in Madinah, it represented the epitome of the juristic tradition of Madinah. This juristic tradition could be traced back to Umar ibn al-Khattab. As such, Shah Wali Allah considered these four schools to be a commentary on the juristic approach of Umar. Hence his assertion in his “Izalat al-Khafa’ ” that Umar was the absolute Mujtahid (al-Mujtahid al Mutlaq), while the three imams, in their relationship to Umar, were no more than Mujtahid Muntasib.

[…]

Shah Wali Allah felt that the Muwatta combined the method of the Fuqaha and that of the Muhaddithin, giving his students the advantages of both the Faqih and the Muhaddith. Moreover, it is considered to be the source of at least three schools of Sunni jurisprudence by most scholars; Wali Allah coniders it to be the basis of all four schools and says that these schools may be considered commentaries on the text of Muwatta.

[Islamic Renaissance in South Asia 1707-1867: The Role of Shah Wali Allah and His Successors, Mahmood Ahmad Ghazi, Adam Publishers, p157-158 & p161]

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Fiqh, Hadith, Islam, Religion, Seeking knowledge

2 responses to “Shah Wali Allah’s View on Muwatta of Imam Malik

  1. invitation2islam

    I highly disagree with the writer. The Hanafi madhab is quite different from the ash Shafi’i and Malaki Fiqh, because it is based from Iraq. The Hanafi fiqh is based from Abdullah Ibn Masud (RA). Al Muwatta was one of the first Hadith collection, which fiqh was derived from, but it was not a book of usul ul fiqh. Imam ash Shafi’i was the one who came out with a work of usul ul fiqh first. Imam ash Shafi’i who studied under Imam Malik, and Abu Yusuf(student of Imam Abu Hanifa) his madhab is closer to that of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal than either Abu Hanifa or Malik. Even though the Ash Shafi’i learned from Malik, his fiqh is quite different. Although I am shocked he learned his fiqh directly from the works of Shafi’i fiqh, because most of the shafi’i fiqh today that is used actually is used from Imam Nawawi. (I”m Shafi’i)
    Wa’alaikum as salam
    Your brother in Islam.

  2. Salaam

    Salaam, My brother, i think you have mistaken. I believe it is a well known fact amongst Muslims that the Usool-e-fiqh and Iqlak aquired by Imam Abu Hanifa was taught by Imam Jafar As-Sadiq. Who is from the direct blood-line of our Prophet (p.b.u.h.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s